1
A patient in IOP was approved for only two weeks of services. At the end of that window, his insurance planned to cut him off — and he had just lost his job. His father was caring for his children, the mother of his children was an addict not seeking recovery, and he was experiencing emotional instability that put him at high risk of relapse if services stopped.
2
We met with the clinical team to prepare for the peer-to-peer review. When we reviewed the documentation, it didn't clearly show why these social and environmental barriers made relapse probable. The clinical team updated the documentation to connect his symptoms to his circumstances: without the structure and support of IOP, relapse was the predictable outcome.
3
The peer-to-peer review won additional days of IOP. The patient stayed in treatment through a critical window.